Those who go into the movement are democrats…

The Prime Minister [Indian] has called Agitational Parasites

while mixing rhetoric with laborers and intellectuals;

Hopefully no one can call a laborer a parasite by adding similar rhetoric.

According to the Prime Minister, taking an ideological stand is also a

symptom of parasites.

Agitator parasites. This interpretation of the Prime Minister cannot be

ignored in Rajya Sabha. The tradition of identifying external elements in

any movement is not entirely new, but in the context of the peasant

movement, this talk of the Prime Minister goes to the point where from the

very first day the dock media had started describing the peasant movement as

part of terrorist and foreign intrigue.

From the other side, the Prime Minister has given a valid nod to the

recognition of the dock media today.

In his response to the President's address, the background of agricultural

law and all the claims can be examined separately but to see a movement

which he has laid the foundation should be done first.

The Prime Minister has called agitational parasites while mixing rhyme

with the proletariat and the intelligentsia; Hopefully no one can call the

proletariat a parasite by mixing similar rhyme. According to the Prime

first glance, this criticism may be of intellectuals standing in support

Minister, taking an ideological stand is also a symptom of parasites. At

of the peasant movement, but stickers of parasites taking ideological

politics. Isn't awesome If you do politics of ideology then nationalism.

stands may also stick on those who proclaim themselves to be ideological

If you take a stand everywhere in the name of another ideology, the

agitating parasites.

 

WHAT IS AGITATOR PARASITE?

According to the Prime Minister [Indian],this is the group that reaches

from the lawyers to the workers' movement. Look closely and listen. The

Prime Minister is not only bringing those who support the movement under

suspicion, but is also rejecting the need for the movement to happen. After

all, a movement will only grow when different people go there. Ideally they

should encourage those going into the movement. Of course they can insist on

non-violence. If people do not come out of their homes in a democracy, then

whose will it be? Is any movement of the world possible without such

farmer leaders must have heard there supporters.

Internet service was restored on the Singhu border on Sunday.

When the Prime Minister was speaking in the Rajya Sabha on Monday, the

Being agitated is not a bad thing. In any democracy, they should be

recognized as civil guards in a dignified way. The District Magistrate

should give a certificate that you participated in the movement. Suppose

you are a conscious citizen. You also go to the rally to protest against

Do you go to revive that movement or go there so that you can live on that

inflation and go to the lawyers' movement, are you a parasitic movement?

movement? People can be called by paying money in political rallies, but

movement?

Apart from the sticks and the police case, what is available in

these movements, why would anyone want to become a parasite for this

if you go to any movement, then the activist parasites?

25-year-old Atika Singh left law school and joined JNU. Aatika says that

being a Dalit, a large part of life is spent in struggle. Sometimes

struggled for his scholarship, sometimes he did for others. After reading

Ambedkar and other writers, they realized that most people are

against the atrocities on women. Participated in anti-citizenship law

marginalized in the system in which they are. Atika joined the movement

the Delhi riots. Participated in agitation against violence after Delhi

movements. Participated in the movement against the violence that followed

demonstrations against section 377. After the death of Rohit Vemula, he

riots. Participated in the movement of sexual exploitation with a student

at Kolkata's Jadavpur University. They have also participated in

terrorists agitators? Are terrorist agitators parasitic?

participated in the movement. Currently, she also goes to the border in

the agricultural movement and is involved in the movement. Are the

The Prime Minister dismisses the number of people who join the movement

simultaneously. In this, you cannot separate the people associated with

the Sangh who go on to join different movements. They can also sometimes

be called agitational parasites.

Saying agitator parasites is telling how the Prime Minister views

people's participation in any movement. Once he saw me with clothes. At

that time, there was a movement against the citizenship law in the

country.

That part of the Prime Minister's speech is worrying. Listening to

anyone, at first it can be said that something fantastic has been said.

While not. You will see that the Prime Minister does not talk about the

stand with him. At least he should have cleared this line in his

coercion and violence demonstrated by the state. His silence makes her

speech.

The United Kisan Morcha claims that 214 farmers have died in the farmer

movement so far. The Prime Minister was heartbroken at the suffering of

the elderly farmers, he was moved to be moved by the death of 214 farmers.

Not only this, when the farmers were prevented from coming to Delhi, deep

were barred on the barricades. Two months later, when the borders of Delhi

trenches were dug along the way, huge boulders were put and barricades

were buried, barbed wire was laid, thirteen layer barricades were erected

challenge of making them law with the time of Shastri ji, but during

and internet service was stopped around the site of the movement, the

Prime Minister did not say whether Shastri Would have done so Compared the

were paper flowers. Those thorns were on the outskirts of Delhi.

Shastri ji, the state of his rule used to bury nails, barbed wire in front

of farmers? There were flowers in the Prime Minister's speeches but they

The Prime Minister has made an important ideological intervention to

watch any movement. This is not such a simple intervention. The way the

dock media was looking at farmers, BJP MPs and leaders and even ministers

were speaking the same language. The Prime Minister did not criticize that

language, but his criticism of a part of the peasant movement began to

reflect the same language. Other words were agitational parasites.

In the year of 2012, when the same group reached the chest of Raisina

Hills for justice of Nirbhaya. Even today, no one will be allowed to come

here and even if people go, the anchors of the dock media will shout

out on the road against all forms of injustice. After his departure, he

slogans from the studio. The people who came here were the ones who came

been on the border of Delhi. It was not allowed to come to Delhi. It will

also came, who had never been in any movement. For 76 days, farmers have

Ramlila ground for weeks. All types of people went to this movement and

all look like a dream now. The farmers did not get permission to visit the

Ramlila ground, but then the Anna movement used to take place in the

this movement, was the Sangh agitator then a parasite according to the

those who went to all kinds of movements. Then nobody called them

agitational parasites. Many experts also write that the Sangh supported

Prime Minister?

When there were agitations in Delhi against the citizenship law, who were

raising slogans, BJP people were raising slogans to shoot them. Till date,

the Prime Minister has not defined such people, the way the parasite has

support this movement getting abroad been defined by the agitators.

Not only this, he also gave a new term to is the foreign destructive ideology

behind the peasant movement?

Is our farmer so self-sufficient that he will give place to the foreign

destructive ideology in his movement? Is our farmer so stupid that he will

fall prey to FDI (foreign destructive ideology). Then what should be said

they be called government parasites? Would it be wrong to see their

to the filmmakers and players who tweet in support of the government. Can

support as parasitic?

This speech of the Prime Minister was unknown to the history of the

movements. Was empty There is movement of thoughts.

On August 28, 1963 in Washington, Martin Luther King made a big march

near Lincoln Memorial on the question of jobs and freedom. More than 2

lakh people had participated. In March, King gave his famous speech "I

have a dream". After this March, John F. Kennedy's administration had to

introduce a bill on civil rights in Congress. Martin Luther King used to

inspired by Gandhi. Could Martin Luther King's influence with Gandhi be

say that he is inspired by Gandhi. His movement is a non-violent movement

FDI for the Kennedy administration? Gandhi himself may have started

to Champaran to protest agitations on so many issues, will Gandhi also start

to be called agitational parasites who also go to South Africa to protest

and also go. Therefore, the notion that the Prime Minister has presented

about FDI and agitators and parasites is not right.

The Prime Minister should tell whom they are calling FDI.

Foreign pop stars tweeting in support of the farmer did not make it clear.

movement or people of Indian origin performing abroad.

The Prime Minister

On February 7, different people of Indian origin demonstrated in support

of the peasant movement in Melbourne, Australia. Citizens of Australia

also participated in this demonstration. This is the section that is said

to be voting in elections. Will they get the right to vote on the

India, then why are these people being mobilized to demonstrate power in

condition that you will only vote, do not protest against the policies of

community went to listen to the Prime Minister's speech at Allfonz Arena

the Prime Minister's visits? On 17 November 2014, people from the Indian in Sydney.

If they can clap on India's achievement, can they not protest against any law?

The Prime Minister should now clarify what he means by the foreign

subversive ideology. Last year, the movement of Black Lives Matter took

place in America. People around the world said and wrote about injustice

with black people. Are all those people living by this definition, are

FDI, which means foreign destructive ideology.

We read in newspapers every day. The government claims that FDI of so

many billion has come. Today this FDI became another name. foreign

destructive ideology. Documents of all movements and political parties are

full of criticism of FDI, which says that under its pressure, India's

ideology. Those who understand the language must be seeing that the FDI

resources are being looted. Foreign dollars also do not come without

the same FDI so that the farmer movement can be demoralized. The most

from which the government raises its collar, is now giving a new name to

brilliant word in the budget book got wiped out by FDI Parcham movement,

the cleanser got wiped out.

Considering the criticism of foreigners who supported the peasant

Words should be used very thoughtfully. The agricultural policies that we

are talking about originated on the land of other countries. The market

which is being projected by these policies has come from FDI. Has come

Tapovan. The Prime Minister was making inadvertent omissions in his

from other countries. He has not been discovered by any sage Muni in

being told that policy is being made under the pressure of America, this

speech. In the first part of this speech, it is said that today they are

was said in the time of Shastriji.

In defense of this criticism, agricultural laws are being brought under

foreign pressure, the Prime Minister cites the time of Shastri but in this

speech, the supporters of the movement go ahead and call them part of the

agricultural laws have been brought for the benefit of two to four

foreign subversive ideology. However, the original criticism was that

industrialists. By not answering it, the Americans answer the charge. The

narendramodi.in titled "Navnirman Andolan (1974): When student power was

Prime Minister is a politician. They know that every movement wants to be

comprehensive. Others should also join him. There is an article on

disturbed by an unhealthy environment!"

By 1973, Narendra Modi had shown keen interest in social activism and had

already participated in several movements against inflation and other

issues affecting the common man. As a young pracharak and ally of the

Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP), Narendra joined the Navnirman

Movement and performed the duties assigned to him with devotion. The Navnirman

movement was a mass movement in every sense like ordinary

citizens from all sections of society stood up as one voice.

We spoke to Manishi Jani, who has been associated with the Navnirman

movement of Gujarat. They say that if the agitators look at the parasite,

then that movement would have remained as students only. Whereas not only

involved.

other people were involved in that movement, but other issues also became

Can the litterateurs involved in the new creation at that time be called

agitational parasites? These Manishi Jani had proposed in the Senate that

there is no meaning of studies, students should work for the new

the convocation of Patna University, Jayaprakash Narayan gave a speech

construction of the society. His proposal fell but at the same time, at

get involved in building a society. Manishi Jani and others call JP to

that the education of children does not make any sense that they should

Ahmedabad. Can JP agitators be called Parijivis?

Ahmedabad. The year was 1974 and 11 February was the day. Jaypee came to

Tomorrow students' fees increase. Job is not available. They agitate. The

police kill them. Will you shut up? Will you not go to support them? If we

go, will we be called agitators and parasites? The Prime Minister says

agitators cannot live without the movement and find ways to live the
that the country should be saved from the agitators. Those who aremovement. We have to recognize such people. Does this sentence enrichThe Prime Minister made many claims in his speech. Told that manydemocracy anywhere? It has been a crime since when to go to any movement.decisions have been made in favor of small farmers. Regarding urea also,

the poor farmers can reach the urea.

our government has made neem coating of urea 100% so that the poorest of

the peasant movement has been organized along the borders of Singhu,

Tikri and Ghazipur, but the farmers' movement has been going on for a long

time in Shahjahanpur of Alwar.

Due to maha panchayats in Rajasthan, the number of farmers on this border has started increasing. aParimal was in Shahjahanpur on Monday.

Parimal said that farmers have been agitating since last 13 December in

Shahjahanpur of Alwar, Rajasthan, adjacent to the Haryana border. The

farmers of Rajasthan are mainly here. Due to the mahapanchayat in Rajasthan

after the 26th January, now the process of continuous gathering of farmers

Bharatpur, Alwar, Karauli etc. have come from places of Rajasthan. Most of

is going on for two to three days. On Sunday night, Dausa, Sawai Madhopur,

Samaj, Muslim. Farmers' camp is about 2 kilometers from Jaipur National

the people who are coming for more than two to three days are the farmers of

Meena society. Apart from this, there are Gurjar Samaj, Mali Samaj, San

Highway in Shahjahanpur, Alwar, Rajasthan.

Actually those who go to the movement are democrats. Democracy is alive

with his departure. Every democracy of the world sees the path of

democracy that when it comes, it will raise the voice of justice and bring

democracy to life. In democracy, parasites are those who enter politics

through the movement and close the paths of the movement.